Defending the SSPX Consecrations: What Everyone is Missing!
Threats of excommunication against the SSPX are unjust and uncharitable. In response, I offer a defense of the Society out of justice and charity.
The SSPX will be consecrating several auxiliary bishops this July of 2026. By doing so, they will maintain the status quo and preserve their ability to fulfill their mission of preserving Catholic Tradition during this crisis in the Church.
Cardinal Victor “Tucho” Fernandez decided to make a big deal out of these upcoming consecrations by threatening excommunications for consecrating bishops without Papal permission. In my opinion, this will do nothing more than shine a light on the crisis in the Church itself, and especially, turn that focus back on the current Vatican hierarchy and the Vatican II revolutionary agenda. This is something they will regret.
Nevertheless, there is a great deal of public misinformation about the upcoming consecrations and whether the Vatican’s threatened excommunications of the SSPX, at least against their bishops, are valid.
The amount of misinformation and ignorance on this topic is quite significant. But this has not stopped those with what can only be described as “SSPX Derangement Syndrome” from bloviating all over social media. They embarrass themselves, and they do not even know it.
With this in mind, as a matter of both justice and charity, I offer this 50-minute video as a complete defense to the SSPX consecrations. What I discovered about the root of these charges against the Society, especially the charge of “schism,” will shock you.
I will let the video speak for itself. Please share the video and subscribe to my channel on YouTube if you haven’t already done so. Thank you.
The modernist method is to cancel and in this level of nastiness they are indeed well practised.
In this Instance they call it excommunication because their grandiosity has consumed their ability to reason.
They place their grubby hands on hips and like a two year old in peak tantrum and ….scream NO !
However the adults have entered the room …..finally.
I am not against the SSPX Declaration. However, the overriding issue for me and CMRI Sedevacantists is this: The SSPX says that ALL of the post-Vatican II popes are all valid. The Church prior to Pacelli definitively taught that heretics, schismatics, and apostates are NOT Catholics and not members of the One, Holy, Catholic, and Apostolic Church. Such men can NEVER become valid popes. That said, the SSPX says that these very men must be recognized and commemorated in the Canon of the Mass. So heretics can be valid popes according to the Society. If they hold this position, it necessarily makes them schismatics and heretics for holding to the condemned heresy of Gallicanism. That makes the Society and their followers heretical and schismatic. That is the only logical outcome. WHY will the SSPX not explain how their position is not in contradiction to the dogmatic teaching of the Church!? This unanswered question is why I eventually left the SSPX and went over to the CMRI. Additionally, the SSPX recognizes the Novus Ordo Mass as valid but illicit- whatever that means. And, for the icing on the theological cake, they also recognize Novus Ordo Holy Orders as valid. How can the SSPX honestly teach the laity that a heretic is a valid pope, but then tell the same laity that they must recognize a heretic as pope and at the same time RESIST him?! The Vatican is now using this heresy of R&R against the Society by declaring upcoming excommunications because they’re resisting Peter- the same man the Society says is most definitely pope! Someone please explain to me how I could possibly support the SSPX using actual Church teachings to refute what I am saying. I’m waiting…